- #Es cierto que samsung se copio de apple how to
- #Es cierto que samsung se copio de apple full
- #Es cierto que samsung se copio de apple software
#Es cierto que samsung se copio de apple software
In the more tech-savvy category falls a retired software executive from IBM and an executive who works in renewable energy. One works as police officer, another is a retired teacher who likes salsa dancing, and yet another is an accounting assistant. While the jury pool comes from people living and working in Silicon Valley, few have tech backgrounds. The companies selected 10 jurors - six women and four men - from a pool of about 140 potential candidates. Samsung saga kicked off Monday with jury selection as the tech giants battle over patent infringement. Samsung introduced its flagship Galaxy S3 in 2012. Samsung, the world's largest mobile phone maker, wants about $7 million from Apple for infringing two of its patents. Apple is arguing that Samsung infringed on five of its patents for the iPhone, its biggest moneymaker. "Samsung specifically chose to copy the features at issue in this case."Īlmost two years after Apple and Samsung faced off in a messy patent dispute, the smartphone and tablet rivals have returned to the same San Jose, Calif., district courtroom to argue once again over patents before federal Judge Lucy Koh. "The evidence in this case will be that Samsung copied the iPhone and it also took many other novel Apple inventions that have not yet appeared in Apple products," McElhinny said.
#Es cierto que samsung se copio de apple how to
En el caso de Alemania el juez dictaminó que Samsung realizaba competencia desleal al copiar el diseño del iPad.Ĭomo veis, Apple siempre aprovecha las situaciones para dar sus puntilladas de color características y en este caso ha aprovechado el asunto para jugar con la ironía.Harold McElhinny, one of the lead attorneys in Apple's patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung, said during opening arguments that Samsung realized it "simply did not have a product that could compete successfully against the iPhone." He cited internal Samsung documents, including a memo containing comments from JK Shin, Samsung's head of mobile, that said the company was suffering a "crisis of design" and had to figure out how to respond to Apple. Para rizar el rizo, Apple ha aprovechado la ocasión para hacer referencias a los halagos que el juez comentó respecto a la extrema simplicidad de sus productos, « un producto que el usuario le gusta mantener entre sus manos«, y comenta de pasada las sentencias de Estados Unidos y Alemania.Įn los Estados Unidos declararon que la marca coreana había cometido una violación de varias patentes de diseño y funcionalidades. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple’s design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S.
However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe. That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. “The informed user’s overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. “The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking.
#Es cierto que samsung se copio de apple full
A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products: On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No.
0 kommentar(er)
